So a Guy Walks Into a Buffet in Las Vegas

It would be funny if it wasn’t so sad:

The day before he put a gun to his head and killed himself at an M Resort buffet on Easter, a Las Vegas man filled a box with his complaints against the resort and its employees and mailed it to the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

In his final, angry message to the world, delivered to the newspaper Monday morning, John Noble blamed his suicide on depression that set in after the Henderson resort awarded him free meals at the buffet for life then banned him from the property in 2013 for harassing some of the women working there.

“Today, I end my life due to the M Resort Spa Casino and its employees,” the 53-year-old Noble wrote in one of two suicide notes he included with an obsessively detailed dossier on the people he blamed for destroying his life.

Easter is a weird day to commit suicide on.  While every other person in the country is celebrating the resurrection of Jesus, you’re putting a bullet in your brain.

Anyhow, this is truly sad and pathetic.  This guy was given free food for life at a resort and he screwed it up.  Then he goes and offs himself largely because of that.

There are plenty of reasons to kill yourself.  I generally don’t judge people who have because that’s not my call to make.  But over the loss of a lifetime buffet?

I mean, hell, Tom Ball immolated himself over the unfair divorce court proceedings he was facing on the courthouse steps.  Sadly, that didn’t even get a mention on the Drudge Report as far as I know.

I have nothing but deep pity for this guy who couldn’t find a better life or change himself for the better.  Instead he’d rather just off himself because he didn’t get free food.

Just wait until the collapse of the welfare system….

Delusional or Just Plain Idiotic?

Here’s some fun with twitter morons:

It starts with Space Bunny stating that overpopulation is a myth and this guy responds:

@Spacebunnyday @TRVdante @voxday @JesseBHolmes pic.twitter.com/JPM3mx2z3P

— Ambika Padmalochana (@AmbikaPadmaloch) April 6, 2015

I go on and make this comment:

@Spacebunnyday @AmbikaPadmaloch @TRVdante @voxday Do these population people even factor in the amount of land humanity actually occupies?

— Mark Fox (@swiftfoxmark2) April 6, 2015

Later, @AmbikaPadmaloch responds:

@AmbikaPadmaloch @Spacebunnyday @TRVdante @voxday You just showed a chart about population increase and cried "overpopulation"

— Mark Fox (@swiftfoxmark2) April 7, 2015

Of course, it gets better.  This person flat out denies ever stating that the graph has anything to do with overpopulation:

@swiftfoxmark2 i posted a graph, but the "crying overpopulation" part is all in your head @Spacebunnyday @TRVdante @voxday

— Ambika Padmalochana (@AmbikaPadmaloch) April 7, 2015

From there I just reiterate that Ambika Padmalochana was posting the graph in response to the original statement of overpopulation being a myth.  I know that the tweet did not literally cry “overpopulation” but any person with a low-triple digit IQ could easily infer that is exactly what this person was saying.

So either this person is stupid, or flat out lying.  Probably some combination of both.

In any case, it was amusing to see it.  Finally Ambika Padmalochana called me an idiot and demanded that I cite Space Bunny’s sources.

This is how the Unmen argue.  They aren’t even half as good and the fictional Unman from whom I derived the term.  They simply are incapable of admitting the truth even when it is staring them right in the face.

Being Anti-Religious Freedom Restoration Act is Pro-Slavery

In case you weren’t paying attention, Indiana passed a law that allows business owners to discriminate against sodomites and carpet lickers.  At least that is the hype in the mainstream press right now.

You see, many business owners got tired of being made slaves of the sacred elite 3% of Americans who demand that their perverted sexual practices be accepted by us “normies”.  In the past, many business owners were sued and fined over not participating in their mock weddings and other assorted activities.

But what most people don’t know is that the law merely allows business owners to use their religion as a defense against a discrimination lawsuit.  So, in essence, it’s not about religious freedom or securing the freedom of association, both rights protected in the Constitution, but merely allowing lawyers to get their dues and have people endure frivolous lawsuits from assholes while claiming that their religion allows them to not cater to assholes.

You see the problem here?  The problem is that Americans have forgotten what it means to be a private property owner and what forced slavery is.  When you force a business owner to do something against his or her will, you are in effect enslaving them.

“But they are getting paid in the process” is the bullshit argument that comes up in the wake of this.  Yes, they probably are getting paid to make a cake featuring two guys blowing each other.  But then again, there were slaves who were paid a wage to do the slave labor they did.

So let’s call what the Lavender Mafia and their assorted allies on the Left out on this.  They are in fact promoting slavery for the sake of overthrowing a religion that tells them they are disgusting.  A religion that is shared by 82% of Americans and one that also served as the basis for the rise of Western Civilization and provided the means for people to find a different way to run their lives besides just conquests and slave labor.

It is a pity that the Indiana Governor caved on this issue.  I don’t know why people feel a need to please Leftists.  They are generally a hateful lot who have no real moral code other than the minority wins, be they the worker, the non-white, or the non-heterosexual.  There isn’t a straight white man that the Leftist sees as a saint while there is a non-straight, non-white person that the Leftist doesn’t think highly of.  Unless said non-straight, non-white person agrees with straight white men who don’t kiss the ass of minorities (and women since women aren’t a minority class but somehow still oppressed by SWMs).

Truth be told, if you think it is okay for men to blow other men or women to go down on other women, I don’t give a damn.  You are wrong if you think it isn’t immoral, but then again, there is a lot wrong with people and this is merely the tip of the iceberg.

But to force that opinion on others through the force of law and then require their services for things they disagree with is slavery.  So do not try to tell me that it is wrong for a baker to deny a wedding cake to a gay couple.

You’re just a slaver in my eyes.

The Unmen Among Us

In the past, I have written about the moral code of the Left.  Basically, it boils down to classes, where people of a certain class are able to commit horrible crimes while people of another are not allowed to do so.  When you apply this standard, the logical conclusion is to demonize those of us in the other class.

This is why hate crimes are considered more heinous than their equivalents when done by members of a minority class.  So when you read or hear about black people murdering and/or raping other people, even non-black people, you do not get the same response from the Left as when a group of white people hurls the word “niggar” at a black person.

Indeed, women and minorities can do no wrong in the eyes of the Left.  Unless, of course, they refuse to tow the ideological line of the Left, which usually involves honoring the overlords of Leftist thought and a hatred of human liberty.  Then they are considered to be part of the majority.  For the Left, race and gender are attitudes and behaviors, not necessarily genetic, which is something that science supports.

I won’t argue that the Leftist is a science-denier, because they will use science to work in their favor.  Like any other ideological group, if it favors their ideals, then it holds up in their ideology.  To deny them is to be a science-denier, despite the fact that the do deny science when it suits them.

An example of this is the idea of transgender individuals.  According to genetic science, most people or either male or female.  Yes, there are abnormalities, but those instances are incredibly rare and usually such people are female.

But most people who are transgender, claim that their genetic code is wrong and that they “feel” like they are of another gender.  The Left currently supports these claims, despite our advanced knowledge of genetics and the mapping of the human genome.

In other words, knowledge is meant to serve them in their minds, not change their minds.  This is the very essence of the Unman, the demon-possessed scientists in C.S. Lewis’ Perelandra, who used its wit and vast knowledge merely as a tool.  When it wasn’t tempting the queen to defy God, it was behaving like a small sociopathic child brutally torturing the animals.

That is the way the Leftist thinks and feels.  They may be well-read, intelligent, and generally likable.  But this is a mask.  Left on their own, they behave like rabid, abhorrent animals.  We see cracks of this once in a while when they do performance art where women will menstruate on canvas or men will place a cross in a jar of urine (here’s a hint: it isn’t art if everybody can do it).

They are so full of hatred, paranoia, envy, greed, and pride that anything good or wholesome is oppressive to them because it is supported by those not like them.

If evolution were true (I am an evolution skeptic), then it would be in our interest as a species to out-breed them, out think them, and ultimately banish them to some other continent and see what creatures they become in a million years.  But that would be inhuman and the vast majority of us who see these people look upon them with pity, not hatred or contempt.

Yes, their actions are contemptible, like when they got rid of health insurance plans so everyone could afford them, but they themselves are to be pitied.  They are broken people, wicked to the core but at the same time desperate to get out without knowing how.

So when you encounter a Leftist, be sure to not hold them in contempt.  Don’t let them get away with their contemptible actions, but remember that they are the Unmen among us.

Human Progress and Evolutionary Skepticism

I’ve had an interesting thought about evolution in the past week.  I wasn’t able to write it down sooner because the job I do to make money has been very busy lately.  That is why there has been sparse postings lately.

Anyway, I was thinking about all the accomplishments of humanity as a whole.  How we have found a way to farm, to build, and to create amazing and complex machines.  More so than that, we are able to comprehend complex concepts that no other species on the planet seems even remotely capable of.

Granted, there are so many things that humanity has done that are horrible, pointless, and otherwise horrendous acts of evil.  We have destroyed the very things we’ve created, both abstractly and literally.  Billions of lives have been snuffed out for the sake of evil.

But on the whole, we’ve been moving forward.  Yes, our current civilization is on the decline, but I see more and more people each day taking up the call to restore what we have lost.  Eventually those voices will be too loud and numerous to not hear.

Now compare what we have done over the thousands of years of our existence to the accomplishments of animals during that same time span.  Even the most intelligent of animals, like chimpanzees or dolphins, don’t seem to create anything more complex than a stick used to pull bugs out of a mud pile.

Yes, animals do build things.  Most of the time it is out of instinct and the shelters tend to be temporary.  They don’t have plumbing, electricity, or any furniture.

Here’s my main point: in the millions of years in which we have supposedly evolved, there has been no species besides man that has managed to build even the simplest of devices.  There has been no monkey who created a small cart to carry his bananas.  There has been no dolphin who has created a floatation device to allow their crippled and young to keep to the surface.

Instead we see animals who operate primarily on instinct.  They build not because they are inspired or because they see the long term, but purely out of instinct.  To top that off, their days are not filled with stories or complex entertainment but simply foraging and surviving.

Human beings strive for greater things.  We seek to do better than just getting by.  Sure, we do that from time to time and there are always tribes of people who do not strive for more.  But of all the creatures on this planet, man is the only one who not created simple machines, but complex ones as well.

We are philosophers, engineers, priests, and leaders.  We form tribes based on common ideas rather than common sub-species.  And we have tamed animals to live among us without trouble (most of the time).

The progress of man is what makes me a skeptic of evolution.  This is because the basic premise of evolution is that human beings are animals, just of a slightly higher order.  This premise is flawed in the face of how much of a higher order humanity is when compared to animals, even the chimpanzees we supposedly evolved from.

There is something special about us that sets us apart from nature.  We require this planet to live and yet we seem to be not altogether part of it.  We bend and break the rules that other animals follow on a daily basis.  It is as if we have our own rules to live by.

I find it odd that most evolutionary priests like to present humanity as some complex animal while at the same these same people tend to condemn us for destroying nature.  Yet in our hearts, we know ourselves to be different, to not operate by instinct alone, and that seems to indicate that there is more than just nature, just animals, and just natural selection.